<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ext4 defragmentation with e4defrag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/</link>
	<description>All About GNU/Linux and BSD - reviews, comparisons, articles</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PolishJoke</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121944</link>
		<dc:creator>PolishJoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121944</guid>
		<description>You people are so very very high.  Don't even know where to start.  RAID arrays die twice over before linux filesystems fragment.  Desktops?  User space?  WTF are you people smoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people are so very very high.  Don&#8217;t even know where to start.  RAID arrays die twice over before linux filesystems fragment.  Desktops?  User space?  WTF are you people smoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdwardOCallaghan</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121718</link>
		<dc:creator>EdwardOCallaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121718</guid>
		<description>Errrm ..

ZFS .. OpenSolaris, OSX and FreeBSD Kernels have it..
Kernel land ZFS in Linux, get with the times Linus..

Give a crack;
www.opensolaris.com

Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errrm ..</p>
<p>ZFS .. OpenSolaris, OSX and FreeBSD Kernels have it..<br />
Kernel land ZFS in Linux, get with the times Linus..</p>
<p>Give a crack;<br />
<a href="http://www.opensolaris.com" rel="nofollow" class="extlink">http://www.opensolaris.com</a></p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scorp123</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121629</link>
		<dc:creator>scorp123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121629</guid>
		<description>LOL, more unqualified nonsense ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, more unqualified nonsense &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121623</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121623</guid>
		<description>Nice article; thanks.
Regardless of whether the file systems fragment, at least you talk about it, and from what I can see everywhere, ext4 really is very good with not having much fragmentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article; thanks.<br />
Regardless of whether the file systems fragment, at least you talk about it, and from what I can see everywhere, ext4 really is very good with not having much fragmentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ok</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121597</link>
		<dc:creator>ok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121597</guid>
		<description>I will give you good advice - _never_ talk about Linux file systems fragmentation (unless you want to be burned at the stake).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will give you good advice - _never_ talk about Linux file systems fragmentation (unless you want to be burned at the stake).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giordano</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121596</link>
		<dc:creator>Giordano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121596</guid>
		<description>There's a spurious "in fact" in the beginning of my previous comment :$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a spurious &#8220;in fact&#8221; in the beginning of my previous comment :$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giordano</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121595</link>
		<dc:creator>Giordano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121595</guid>
		<description>In fact, if you have a look at &lt;a href="https://ols2006.108.redhat.com/2007/Reprints/sato-Reprint.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;the paper&lt;/a&gt; linked in the wikipedia ext4 article you can read these lines at the end:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
To reduce system administrator’s effort, it is nec-
essary to automate defragmentation. This can be
realized by the following procedure.
  1. The kernel notiﬁes the occurrence of frag-
      ments to user space.
  2. The user space daemon catches the notiﬁca-
      tion and executes the defragmentation com-
      mand.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This could really be a cool feature to have ^_^.
The effort required to the user to maintain an efficient system under the fs aspect would be basically cut down to 0 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, if you have a look at <a href="https://ols2006.108.redhat.com/2007/Reprints/sato-Reprint.pdf" rel="nofollow" class="extlink">the paper</a> linked in the wikipedia ext4 article you can read these lines at the end:</p>
<blockquote><p>
To reduce system administrator’s effort, it is nec-<br />
essary to automate defragmentation. This can be<br />
realized by the following procedure.<br />
  1. The kernel notiﬁes the occurrence of frag-<br />
      ments to user space.<br />
  2. The user space daemon catches the notiﬁca-<br />
      tion and executes the defragmentation com-<br />
      mand.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This could really be a cool feature to have ^_^.<br />
The effort required to the user to maintain an efficient system under the fs aspect would be basically cut down to 0 <img src='http://polishlinux.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121590</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 07:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/apps/cli/ext4-defragmentation-with-e4defrag/#comment-121590</guid>
		<description>As mentioned in my previous comment in your previous thread, fsck is only reporting inode fragmentation, *NOT* block fragmentation.  Also, e4defrag is designed specifically for this use.  Taking a look at one of the key features of ext4- extents, you will have an exceptionally difficult time fragmenting the inodes on this filesystem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned in my previous comment in your previous thread, fsck is only reporting inode fragmentation, *NOT* block fragmentation.  Also, e4defrag is designed specifically for this use.  Taking a look at one of the key features of ext4- extents, you will have an exceptionally difficult time fragmenting the inodes on this filesystem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
