<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GConf &#8212; GNOME under the hood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/</link>
	<description>All About GNU/Linux and BSD - reviews, comparisons, articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:07:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corinta</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-210236</link>
		<dc:creator>Corinta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 22:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-210236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not bad!http://www.celularesdesbloqueados.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not bad!<a href="http://www.celularesdesbloqueados.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.celularesdesbloqueados.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwkse</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-121586</link>
		<dc:creator>iwkse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-121586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God bless gconf creators...

They had to feel really down to give the birth to such useless and obscure crap like gconf.
They said it was created to help administrators...I wonder if they asked firstly to some administrators if they would prefer plain clean text files instead of such rubbish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God bless gconf creators&#8230;</p>
<p>They had to feel really down to give the birth to such useless and obscure crap like gconf.<br />
They said it was created to help administrators&#8230;I wonder if they asked firstly to some administrators if they would prefer plain clean text files instead of such rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExTechOp</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-49000</link>
		<dc:creator>ExTechOp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-49000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned, the default for most systems is to show the contents of the ~/Desktop directory as icons on the desktop. However, if you rmdir this directory, Nautilus(?) will switch to showing your whole home directory as icons on the desktop. Re-creating the directory will not revert back to the default behavior, even if the gconf key &lt;code&gt;/apps/nautilus/preferences/desktop_is_home_dir&lt;/code&gt; is false. See Bugzilla &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251301&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;#251301&lt;/a&gt;, can anyone shed more light on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned, the default for most systems is to show the contents of the ~/Desktop directory as icons on the desktop. However, if you rmdir this directory, Nautilus(?) will switch to showing your whole home directory as icons on the desktop. Re-creating the directory will not revert back to the default behavior, even if the gconf key <code>/apps/nautilus/preferences/desktop_is_home_dir</code> is false. See Bugzilla <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251301" rel="nofollow">#251301</a>, can anyone shed more light on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prakash Jose Kokkattu</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-41963</link>
		<dc:creator>Prakash Jose Kokkattu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/gnome/gconf-gnome-under-the-hood/#comment-41963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say that there is gconf-cleaner released
code.google.com/p/gconf-cleaner/
the sole purpose is to clean waste entries of gconf-registry :( :x
Why do we need gconf?it sucks ? and I love Gnome too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that there is gconf-cleaner released<br />
code.google.com/p/gconf-cleaner/<br />
the sole purpose is to clean waste entries of gconf-registry <img src='http://polishlinux.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://polishlinux.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mad.gif' alt=':x' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Why do we need gconf?it sucks ? and I love Gnome too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
