<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amarok 2: Visual Changelog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/</link>
	<description>All About GNU/Linux and BSD - reviews, comparisons, articles</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Steinert</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121828</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Steinert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121828</guid>
		<description>For a simple player, try VLC. It plays anything you throw at it. Music, Video, DVD. You name it it plays it. And only a simple playlist will give you exactly what you want. No good if you want a media library, or visualistations, or anything fancy. But as a simple player its perfect!

Before i realised the limitations of the video player window, I was seriously considering using the underlying library for my own, more fully featured media player!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a simple player, try VLC. It plays anything you throw at it. Music, Video, DVD. You name it it plays it. And only a simple playlist will give you exactly what you want. No good if you want a media library, or visualistations, or anything fancy. But as a simple player its perfect!</p>
<p>Before i realised the limitations of the video player window, I was seriously considering using the underlying library for my own, more fully featured media player!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Скрепка</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121549</link>
		<dc:creator>Скрепка</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121549</guid>
		<description>Чому амароке, моке наше фсио. песпесты, риале!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Чому амароке, моке наше фсио. песпесты, риале!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ящурецца</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121546</link>
		<dc:creator>Ящурецца</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121546</guid>
		<description>ОЯЕБУ!11 КОМРАДЕ ОН КРАСИВ ЭТОТ ЛИНАКС!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ОЯЕБУ!11 КОМРАДЕ ОН КРАСИВ ЭТОТ ЛИНАКС!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toim</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121542</link>
		<dc:creator>toim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 02:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121542</guid>
		<description>kool appearance of Amarok 2.When it'll be released? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kool appearance of Amarok 2.When it&#8217;ll be released? <img src='http://polishlinux.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marto</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121540</link>
		<dc:creator>marto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121540</guid>
		<description>Maybe it looks huge, but it will be polished in future. KDE 4 isnt nicely looking yet (but did it stepped back? no!)

Amarok 2 is future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it looks huge, but it will be polished in future. KDE 4 isnt nicely looking yet (but did it stepped back? no!)</p>
<p>Amarok 2 is future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121535</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 08:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121535</guid>
		<description>xmms still looks good to me and plays just fine.  :)  using it right now to listen to my old kosmic tunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xmms still looks good to me and plays just fine.  <img src='http://polishlinux.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  using it right now to listen to my old kosmic tunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom-erik</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121534</link>
		<dc:creator>tom-erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 07:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121534</guid>
		<description>Why cant amarok use the darn systemfont in the gui.. I hate that large clumsy font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why cant amarok use the darn systemfont in the gui.. I hate that large clumsy font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Marc Liotier</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121532</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Marc Liotier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 05:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/kde/amarok-2-visual-changelog/#comment-121532</guid>
		<description>If you are using Amarok and want a "simple player" - then you are entirely missing the point of Amarok. There are plenty of nice simple Winamp-like players out there !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are using Amarok and want a &#8220;simple player&#8221; - then you are entirely missing the point of Amarok. There are plenty of nice simple Winamp-like players out there !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
