<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mandriva 2007 Beta 2 - short review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/</link>
	<description>All About GNU/Linux and BSD - reviews, comparisons, articles</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-805</guid>
		<description>I tried Mandriva 2007 Beta 2 but it would not install on my SATA HD (can not find the HD). It did install on my PATA drive.  Also the RPM installer did not function.Looks good tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Mandriva 2007 Beta 2 but it would not install on my SATA HD (can not find the HD). It did install on my PATA drive.  Also the RPM installer did not function.Looks good tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michuk</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>michuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-777</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The selection of default apps installed is basic only for the free edition (but still lots better than kubuntu/ubuntu).&lt;/em&gt;

Well, that's very subjective you know. I personally like the Kubuntu defaults a lot (Mandriva is not bad either, to make it clear).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The selection of default apps installed is basic only for the free edition (but still lots better than kubuntu/ubuntu).</em></p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s very subjective you know. I personally like the Kubuntu defaults a lot (Mandriva is not bad either, to make it clear).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>I personally have used the free Community edition for years and changing/customizing your desktop is really very easy so to answer your question, no.

The selection of default apps installed is basic only for the free edition (but still lots better than kubuntu/ubuntu). Upgrading apps or adding new ones you can choose from repositories of many thousands of software packages, urpmi is your friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally have used the free Community edition for years and changing/customizing your desktop is really very easy so to answer your question, no.</p>
<p>The selection of default apps installed is basic only for the free edition (but still lots better than kubuntu/ubuntu). Upgrading apps or adding new ones you can choose from repositories of many thousands of software packages, urpmi is your friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david syes</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>david syes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Will I be able to replace ksplash or whatever is keeping me from seeing the pre-login background? I suppose since this is the "Free" version, I should not complain, but Ubuntu/Kubuntu let me show the user pics, the panel with single image, and desktop background changing when all users have logged our or are none are yet logged in. Is Mandriva purposely doing that to irritate users into buying the non-free version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will I be able to replace ksplash or whatever is keeping me from seeing the pre-login background? I suppose since this is the &#8220;Free&#8221; version, I should not complain, but Ubuntu/Kubuntu let me show the user pics, the panel with single image, and desktop background changing when all users have logged our or are none are yet logged in. Is Mandriva purposely doing that to irritate users into buying the non-free version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod-OS.com :: Te ponemos al dia &#187; Revisión Mandriva Linux 2007 Beta 2 2.0</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod-OS.com :: Te ponemos al dia &#187; Revisión Mandriva Linux 2007 Beta 2 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-753</guid>
		<description>[...] Polishlinux.org publica una corta revisión que repasa los nuevos aspectos de Mandriva Linux 2007 con el veredicto al que esta distro nos tiene acostumbrado: es una solución perfecta para los &#8220;novatos&#8221; en el mundo Linux.   Enviado por Ordo 30/8/2006 7:13 am &#124; &#124;  &#124; Mandrake &#124; Del.icio.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Polishlinux.org publica una corta revisión que repasa los nuevos aspectos de Mandriva Linux 2007 con el veredicto al que esta distro nos tiene acostumbrado: es una solución perfecta para los &#8220;novatos&#8221; en el mundo Linux.   Enviado por Ordo 30/8/2006 7:13 am | |  | Mandrake | Del.icio.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandriva 2007 Beta 2 - short review &#171; Linux and Technology blog</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandriva 2007 Beta 2 - short review &#171; Linux and Technology blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-751</guid>
		<description>[...] Read full reviewÂ  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read full reviewÂ  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kensai</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Kensai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-743</guid>
		<description>I use the Gnome version as well and runs perfectly stable, not a single crash yet, and is just a beta2. But I see Mandriva is taking now the right dirrection after their disaster with 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the Gnome version as well and runs perfectly stable, not a single crash yet, and is just a beta2. But I see Mandriva is taking now the right dirrection after their disaster with 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamW</title>
		<link>http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polishlinux.org/linux/mandriva/mandriva-2007-beta-2-short-review/#comment-742</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review. On the default applications, Fred (Crozat, our GNOME packager) likes as a matter of policy to stay as close to upstream GNOME as possible. Also, in practical terms, I'd be opposed to Banshee being the default music player because it's still way too broken and unstable - it still has trouble dealing with my moderately large music collection, and tends to crash a lot. Personally I use muine, but I think rhythmbox is a perfectly sensible default.

I'm trying to find out what we're going to do about desktop search for 2007. We got rather burned by including Kat in 2006, so it may be a case of once bitten, twice shy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. On the default applications, Fred (Crozat, our GNOME packager) likes as a matter of policy to stay as close to upstream GNOME as possible. Also, in practical terms, I&#8217;d be opposed to Banshee being the default music player because it&#8217;s still way too broken and unstable - it still has trouble dealing with my moderately large music collection, and tends to crash a lot. Personally I use muine, but I think rhythmbox is a perfectly sensible default.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to find out what we&#8217;re going to do about desktop search for 2007. We got rather burned by including Kat in 2006, so it may be a case of once bitten, twice shy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
