Comments on: Windows vs Linux: Architecture, part I http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/ All About GNU/Linux and BSD - reviews, comparisons, articles Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:43:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Linux vs. Windows http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-102694 Linux vs. Windows Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:34:46 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-102694 Great read. A lot of people do think Linux is in direct competition with Windows, but the reality is they are two different beasts that solve two different problems. Great read. A lot of people do think Linux is in direct competition with Windows, but the reality is they are two different beasts that solve two different problems.

]]> By: Rajagopal http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-68123 Rajagopal Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:19:33 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-68123 oops iot should read Thane, Maharshtra, India ps. incidently maharshtra means great nation and its power (electrical energy) situation is pathetic to say the least and to think that it housed the Financial capital of Bombay (now Mumbai) thanks to its wonderful governance oops iot should read
Thane, Maharshtra, India

ps. incidently maharshtra means great nation and its power (electrical energy) situation is pathetic to say the least and to think that it housed the Financial capital of Bombay (now Mumbai) thanks to its wonderful governance

]]> By: Rajagopal http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-68121 Rajagopal Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:16:42 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-68121 After waging a nuclear war against m$win for about ... years with users and after a cold war , I have somewhat managed to get the users to know what stable computing means with (of course) linux in FC3 and Centos5 incarnations in one small speck of the GPS in the +0530 timezone. quite a few of them have indeed installed at least openoffice and some even Linux. though it required a bit of extra effort from my side, they feel safe and comfortable now. Actually m$ just needs exist for free software and linux and open source to thrive... I don't care about flames.. but what the heck any thing that leads to uptake of GPL2 GPL3 licence and opensource and anything best is always welcome.... Rajagopal Rhane, Maharshtra, India After waging a nuclear war against m$win for about … years with users and after a cold war , I have somewhat managed to get the users to know what stable computing means with (of course) linux in FC3 and Centos5 incarnations in one small speck of the GPS in the +0530 timezone. quite a few of them have indeed installed at least openoffice and some even Linux. though it required a bit of extra effort from my side, they feel safe and comfortable now.

Actually m$ just needs exist for free software and linux and open source to thrive…

I don’t care about flames.. but what the heck any thing that leads to uptake of GPL2 GPL3 licence and opensource and anything best is always welcome….

Rajagopal
Rhane, Maharshtra, India

]]> By: Ken Holmes http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54845 Ken Holmes Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:17:59 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54845 Perhaps you would understand the article better reading it in the authors native language. I confess that I know only a few words in languages other than English. I appreciate and respect that this author and others makes an effort to communicate in a language that is second or third for him. And like other who have responded, I have found the article understandable and informative. As IBM used to post: THINK Perhaps you would understand the article better reading it in the authors native language. I confess that I know only a few words in languages other than English. I appreciate and respect that this author and others makes an effort to communicate in a language that is second or third for him. And like other who have responded, I have found the article understandable and informative. As IBM used to post: THINK

]]> By: Ken Holmes http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54844 Ken Holmes Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:10:53 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54844 You, sir, need to learn the difference between FOSS and FOS. And you need to get treatment for the latter. You, sir, need to learn the difference between FOSS and FOS. And you need to get treatment for the latter.

]]> By: Ken Holmes http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54841 Ken Holmes Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:05:18 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54841 You can make sense of the article. You just have to want to. You can make sense of the article. You just have to want to.

]]> By: omg http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54591 omg Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:19:10 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54591 While this article is mildly amusing at times, the author is so clearly biased that any analysis or conclusion must be viewed suspiciously. Since that effectively defeats the purpose of the article itself, it is simply not worth reading. While this article is mildly amusing at times, the author is so clearly biased that any analysis or conclusion must be viewed suspiciously. Since that effectively defeats the purpose of the article itself, it is simply not worth reading.

]]> By: warner http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54543 warner Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:58:45 +0000 http://polishlinux.org/linux/windows-vs-linux-architecture-part-i/#comment-54543 I thought this was a great _concrete_ visual example of _both_ the differences in architecture, and why that translates into more maintainable (i.e. more secure) code. <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=311" rel="nofollow">Why Windows is less secure than Linux</a> I thought this was a great _concrete_ visual example of _both_ the differences in architecture, and why that translates into more maintainable (i.e. more secure) code.

Why Windows is less secure than Linux

]]>