Arch

Subscribe to RSS feed for this article! | Trackback URI

12 Comments

fold this thread k  Tuesday, 29 August 2006 o godz. 11:16 pm #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

“Info: Desktop: XFCE” ???

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread michuk  Wednesday, 30 August 2006 o godz. 1:17 am #  Add karma Subtract karma  +1

Fixed to ‘none’. Thanks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread LinuxRen » Blog Archive » 怎样在Linux中安装软件  Thursday, 3 May 2007 o godz. 7:17 pm #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[...] TGZ: 被 Slackware Frugalware, KateOS Arch Linux以及大部分Linux系统所支持的传统安装包, [...]

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread zoodayz  Saturday, 5 May 2007 o godz. 4:14 am #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

“obviou” type O with a “s”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread t_ziel  Wednesday, 4 July 2007 o godz. 5:06 pm #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

@zoodayz
Thank You. Corrected.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread Carl Mueller  Monday, 24 March 2008 o godz. 12:32 am #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

The community repository (AUR) has vast numbers of packages. I’ve never seen anything in Ubuntu that wasn’t in Arch, but there are Arch packages which are not in Ubuntu.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
fold this thread michuk  Wednesday, 26 March 2008 o godz. 3:34 pm #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Like which ones?

fold this thread MONODA  Friday, 27 June 2008 o godz. 8:30 am #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

OSMO isnt in ubuntu. But not all debian/ubuntu packages can be found in arch repos, but most can.

 
 
 
fold this thread Carl Mueller  Saturday, 12 April 2008 o godz. 12:13 am #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Here are a few.

jUploadr
kdedecor-crystal
KDEmod
d3lphin

I’m sure there are some in Ubuntu which aren’t in Arch, but I’m just telling you my experiences. Ubuntu is very complete, so I meant this more as a complement to Arch than a complaint about Ubuntu.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread anonymous  Saturday, 5 July 2008 o godz. 10:08 am #  Add karma Subtract karma  +1

I switched to Arch Linux because I could not take anymore the Gentoo community (or alternatively: I did not want to be part of anything that resembles that community). I have been happy ever since.

The pros are laid down quite well: rolling updates and minimalism together with configuration appeals to a BSD-user like me. While I consider the lack of a graphical installer to be a good thing, one con I have noticed is that the distribution lacks proper information channels for security bug fixes; wouldn’t recommend for a mission-critical system.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread Gjoellee  Tuesday, 21 October 2008 o godz. 9:06 pm #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

You should add the link http://www.archux.com

It has a lot of tutorials etc… for Arch Linux

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
fold this thread buy graduation dresses  Friday, 7 June 2013 o godz. 11:20 am #  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[URL="http:altsberglotion"]Altsberglotion[URL]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[URL="http:altsberglotionenhemorrhoid-cure"]Get rid of Hemmroids[U…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Adjust field size: shrink | enlarge)


You can use simple HTML in your comments. Some examples are as follows:
  • A hyperlink: <a href="polishlinux.org">GNU/Linux for everyone!</a>,
  • Strong text: <strong>Strong text</strong>,
  • Italic text: <em>italic text</em>,
  • Strike: <strike>strike</strike>,
  • Code: <code>printf("hello world");</code>,
  • Block quote: <blockquote>Block quote</blockquote>